CO129-353 - Public Offices - 1908 — Page 584

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

On March 1st 1907 Mr. Mansfield received a second letter of repost from the Chief Justice, enclosing a notice of a concurrent writ and an order of the Court of which substituted service was to be effected on defendant's firm.

This request was duly complied with on March 10th, the notice being served by the Consular Constable. In this case I must admit that Mr. Mansfield established a precedent for the service of a writ of summons issued by the Supreme Court on a Chinese defendant resident outside the jurisdiction of the Court by this Consulate-General, and although in my own opinion the expediency, if not the legality, of my predecessor's action is open to question, I should have been prepared, had the request been communicated to me in this form, to defer to his greater knowledge and experience of legal procedure in mixed cases in China, and undertake the service of the writ. I am still prepared to do so, but, as I am referring this point to His Majesty's Minister in Peking, I would prefer to await his instructions before taking any further steps in the matter.

The original question, however, on which I ventured to join issue with the Chief Justice, was his request that the

Edit History

2026-06-07 07:56:14 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
On March 1st 1907 Mr. Mansfield received a second letter of repost from the Chief Justice, enclosing a notice of a concurrent writ and an order of the Court of which substituted service was to be effected on defendant's firm. This request was duly complied with on March 10th, the notice being served by the Consular Constable. In this case I must admit that Mr. Mansfield established a precedent for the service of a writ of summons issued by the Supreme Court on a Chinese defendant resident outside the jurisdiction of the Court by this Consulate-General, and although in my own opinion the expediency, if not the legality, of my predecessor's action is open to question, I should have been prepared, had the request been communicated to me in this form, to defer to his greater knowledge and experience of legal procedure in mixed cases in China, and undertake the service of the writ. I am still prepared to do so, but, as I am referring this point to His Majesty's Minister in Peking, I would prefer to await his instructions before taking any further steps in the matter. The original question, however, on which I ventured to join issue with the Chief Justice, was his request that the
Baseline (Original)
)})} On March 1st 1907 r. nsfield received a second letter of Repost from the Chief Justice, unclosing a notice of a 580 concurront erit ad an order of the Court of which sub- stituted servios was to be offocted on defendant's firm. This request was duly complied with on Kurch 10th., the noticne boin: sorved by the Consular Constable. In this case I must admit that Fr. Wefield established a proovdent for the service of a writ of summons issued by the Puproce Court on a Chinoso defendant resident outside the juris- diction of the Court by this Consulate-General, and although in my own opinion the expediency, if not the legality, of my prodocessor's action is open to question, I should have boun prepared, bad the roquest been corramiosted to me in this form, to defer to his crater knowledge and experience of legal procedure in mixed capes in hins, and undertake tho service of the writ. I am still prepared to do so, but, an I am referring this point to His Majesty's Minister in Peking, I would prefer to await his instructions before taking any further stops in the mattor. The original question, however, on which I ventured to join issue with the Chief Justico, was, his request that the
2026-06-07 07:56:14 · Baseline
View content

)})}

On March 1st 1907 r. nsfield received a second letter of

Repost from the Chief Justice, unclosing a notice of a

580

concurront erit ad an order of the Court of which sub-

stituted servios was to be offocted on defendant's firm.

This request was duly complied with on Kurch 10th., the

noticne boin: sorved by the Consular Constable. In this

case I must admit that Fr. Wefield established a proovdent

for the service of a writ of summons issued by the Puproce

Court on a Chinoso defendant resident outside the juris-

diction of the Court by this Consulate-General, and although

in my own opinion the expediency, if not the legality, of my

prodocessor's action is open to question, I should have boun

prepared, bad the roquest been corramiosted to me in this

form, to defer to his crater knowledge and experience of

legal procedure in mixed capes in hins, and undertake tho

service of the writ. I am still prepared to do so, but, an I

am referring this point to His Majesty's Minister in Peking,

I would prefer to await his instructions before taking any

further stops in the mattor.

The original question, however, on which I ventured

to join issue with the Chief Justico, was, his request that

the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.